In Protest,
the Power of Place
United Press International
OHIO, 1970 Tear gas against
protesters at Kent State
By MICHAEL
KIMMELMAN
Published: October 15, 2011
Michael
Kimmelman is the architecture critic of The New York Times.
Bettmann/Corbis
NEW YORK, 1967 Central Park
protest against the Vietnam War
THE ever expanding Occupy Wall
Street movement, with encampments now not only in Lower Manhattan
but also in Washington, London and other cities, proves among other things that
no matter how instrumental new media have become in spreading protest these
days, nothing replaces people taking to the streets.
Another reminder came late last week when the landlord of
Zuccotti Park, where the demonstrators in New York City have settled, at the
last minute withdrew a request for police assistance in cleaning up the park.
This, at least temporarily, averted a confrontation in front of the global
media over what protesters regarded as just a pretext to evict them.
We tend to underestimate the political power of physical
places. Then Tahrir Square comes along. Now it’s Zuccotti Park, until four
weeks ago an utterly obscure city-block-size downtown plaza with a few trees
and concrete benches, around the corner from ground zero and two blocks north
of Wall Street on Broadway. A few hundred people with ponchos and sleeping bags
have put it on the map.
Kent State, Tiananmen Square, the Berlin Wall:
we clearly use locales, edifices, architecture to house our memories and
political energy. Politics troubles our consciences. But places haunt our
imaginations.
So we check in on Facebook and Twitter, but make pilgrimages
to Antietam, Auschwitz and to the Acropolis, to gaze at rubble from the days of
Pericles and Aristotle.
I thought of Aristotle, of all people, while I watched the
Zuccotti Park demonstrators hold one of their “general assemblies” the other
day. In his “Politics,” Aristotle argued that the size of an ideal polis
extended to the limits of a herald’s cry. He believed that the human voice was
directly linked to civic order. A healthy citizenry in a proper city required
face-to-face conversation.
It so happens that near the start of the protest, when the
police banned megaphones at Zuccotti Park, they obliged demonstrators to come
up with an alternative. “Mic checks”
became the consensus method of circulating announcements, spread through the
crowd by people repeating, phrase by phrase, what a speaker had said to others
around them, compelling everyone, as it were, to speak in one voice. It’s like
the old game of telephone, and it is painstakingly slow.
“But so is democracy,” as Jay Gaussoin, a 46-year-old
unemployed actor and carpenter, put it to me. “We’re so distracted these days,
people have forgotten how to focus. But the ‘mic check’ demands not just that
we listen to other people’s opinions but that we really hear what they’re
saying because we have to repeat their words exactly.
“It requires an architecture of consciousness,” was Mr.
Gaussoin’s apt phrase.
Much as it can look at a glance like a refugee camp in the
early morning, when the protesters are just emerging from their sleeping bags,
Zuccotti Park has in fact become a miniature polis, a little city in the
making. That it happens also to be a private park is one of the most revealing
subtexts of the story. Formerly Liberty Park, the site was renamed in 2006
after John E. Zuccotti, chairman of Brookfield Office Properties, the park’s
owner. A zoning variance granted to Brookfield years ago requires that the
park, unlike a public, city-owned one, remain open day and night.
This peculiarity of zoning law has turned an unexpected
spotlight on the bankruptcy of so much of what in the last couple of
generations has passed for public space in America. Most of it is token
gestures by developers in return for erecting bigger, taller buildings. Think
of the atrium of the I.B.M. tower on Madison Avenue and countless other places
like it: “public” spaces that are not really public at all but quasi-public,
controlled by their landlords. Zuccotti in principle is subject to Brookfield’s
rules prohibiting tarps, sleeping bags and the storage of personal property on
the site. The whole situation illustrates just how far we have allowed the
ancient civic ideal of public space to drift from an arena of public expression
and public assembly (Speakers’ Corner in Hyde Park, say) to a commercial sop
(the foyer of the Time Warner Center).
No comments:
Post a Comment